2018 Mazda Mazda6 — reported problems

CarFaultIQ holds 610 evidence records for the 2018 Mazda Mazda6, drawn from official sources and owner complaints.

What owners report: issue areas

Owner complaints are classified by the system they concern: 82 classifications in all. One complaint can concern several systems, so these add up to more than the number of complaints.

  • Engine32 (39.0%)Official recall records for this system: 3, covering model years 2018–2019.
  • Powertrain (transmission & drivetrain)9 (11.0%)Official recall records for this system: 1, covering model years 2018–2019.
  • Fuel system7 (8.5%)Official recall records for this system: 12, covering model years 2003–2018.
  • Brakes4 (4.9%)Official recall records for this system: 4, covering model years 2003–2015.
  • Electrical system4 (4.9%)Official recall records for this system: 3, covering model years 2014–2016.
  • Suspension3 (3.7%)Official recall records for this system: 2, covering model years 2009–2013.

Other / uncategorized: 10 classifications (12.2%) were not assigned to a specific system by the source. They are counted but not treated as an issue area.

These are counts of records held by CarFaultIQ, not a failure rate. More records can simply mean more vehicles were sold or more owners reported. No vehicles-in-service figure exists in this data, so no reliability or risk score can be derived from it.

What the records are about, by source

Each source is kept separate: owner complaints, recalls, manufacturer communications and investigations are different kinds of record and are never added together. All model years.

  • Owner complaints (4,408 records, model years 2003–2021) are most frequently classified under: air bags (restraint system), body & structure and electrical system.
  • Safety recalls (117 records, model years 2003–2019) are most frequently classified under: air bags (restraint system), fuel system and lights.
  • Transport Canada recalls (85 records, model years 2004–2019) are most frequently classified under: air bags (restraint system), fuel system and body & structure.
  • Manufacturer communications (8,064 records, model years 2003–2021) are most frequently classified under: equipment & accessories, electrical system and engine.
  • Investigations (28 records, model years 2003–2010) are most frequently classified under: air bags (restraint system), fuel system and doors, latches & locks.

"Most frequently classified under" reports how the records are filed by the source. It is not a finding about causes, and a record can be filed under more than one system. Read the individual records

Evidence by model year

Records held per model year. Select a year to narrow this page to it.

  1. 2003 396 records for 2003
  2. 2004 399 records for 2004
  3. 2005 353 records for 2005
  4. 2006 378 records for 2006
  5. 2007 389 records for 2007
  6. 2008 338 records for 2008
  7. 2009 656 records for 2009
  8. 2010 489 records for 2010
  9. 2011 390 records for 2011
  10. 2012 354 records for 2012
  11. 2013 266 records for 2013
  12. 2014 900 records for 2014
  13. 2015 672 records for 2015
  14. 2016 748 records for 2016
  15. 2017 576 records for 2017
  16. 2018 610 records for 2018
  17. 2019 426 records for 2019
  18. 2020 365 records for 2020
  19. 2021 317 records for 2021

Counts are not adjusted for how many vehicles were sold in each year, so a taller year is not necessarily a worse year.

Reports mentioning outcomes

  • 1mention a crash
  • 1mention a fire
  • 1mention an injury

These are counts of records whose report mentioned the outcome. They are not a severity rating and not a safety assessment of this vehicle.

Official records held

  • Safety recalls NHTSA 2
  • Manufacturer communications NHTSA 548
  • Transport Canada recalls Transport Canada 2
  • Owner complaints NHTSA 58

Explore the underlying evidence records

Diagnostic codes found in evidence for this vehicle

These codes appear by explicit identifier in official records matched to this exact model and year.

A code appearing in a record means the code was named in that document. It is not a diagnosis of this vehicle, not a fault this vehicle has, and not an indication of urgency. Diagnosis requires reading live data from the vehicle.

Where to go next